Income tax penalty u/s 271c

Author: gvyg

August undefined, 2024

WebMar 16, 2009 · 1. Penalty u/s 221 is imposed by AO while by Joint Comm. u/s 271C. 2. Section 221 comes into play only when there is a defaul in payment while 271C comes … WebApr 12, 2024 · Supreme Court Held. The Supreme Court held that section 271C (1) (a) is applicable in case of a failure on the part of the assessee to “deduct” the whole or any part of the tax as required under the provisions of the Act. The words used in Section 271C (1) (a) are very clear, and the relevant words used are “fails to deduct.”.

Mere belated TDS Remittance won

WebApr 10, 2024 · The Hon’ble Supreme Court opined that on true interpretation of Section 271C, there shall not be any penalty u/s 271C on mere delay in remittance of the TDS after … Web3 hours ago · 6. Thus, from the above, it is evident that non-specification of the limb of the notice would render the penalty proceedings invalid. Accordingly, respectfully following the precedent, we set-aside the orders of the authorities below holding that notice u/s 271 (1) (c) is omnibus notice, thus defective which goes to the root of the matter. highest quality mini dvr hdmi

Mere Delay In Remittance Of TDS Doesn’t Attract Penalty Under S 271C …

The penalty under section 271C is applicable under the following conditions – 1. The person fails to deduct, the whole or part of, tax at source (i.e. TDS). 2. The person fails to pay, the whole or part of, Dividend Distribution … See more In case of default, the penalty under section 271Cis leviable to the extent of an amount equal to TDS not deducted / not paid. See more Q 1. What is Chapter XVIIB? Ans:Chapter XVII of the Income Tax Act covers provisions relating to ‘Collection and recovery of tax’. Part B of Chapter XVII (i.e. Chapter XVIIB) covers … See more WebApr 10, 2024 · On 02.06.2003, Income Tax Officer (ITO) vide order under Section 201(1A) of the Act, 1961 levied penal interest of Rs. 4,97,920/for the period of delay in remittance of TDS. On 09.10.2003, the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax issued a show cause notice proposing to levy penalty under Section 271C of the amount equal to TDS. Web1 day ago · The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and a notice under section 143(2) was served on the assessee on 22.09.2016. The Assessing Officer(AO) passed assessment order u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2.1 The AO has levied penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act. Aggrieved by the penalty order the Assessee had filed appeal … highest quality output for lcd

Section 271C of the Income Tax Act - TDS Provisions - IndiaFilings

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(C) - CAclubindia

WebApr 12, 2024 · Supreme Court Held. The Supreme Court held that section 271C (1) (a) is applicable in case of a failure on the part of the assessee to “deduct” the whole or any part … WebApr 10, 2024 · The Supreme Court Monday held that no penalty shall be leviable under section 271C of the Income Tax Act over mere belated remittance of the tax deducted at source (TDS) after its deduction by the assessee concerned. The top court noted that section 271C of the Act deals with penalty for failure to deduct TDS. highest quality photo formatWebIncome Tax Penalty u/s 271C - failure on the part of the assessee to deduct tax at source - without declaring the assessee as assessee in default under section 201(1) no penalty … highest quality neckband earbuds

"WebApr 12, 2024 · On 09.10.2003, the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax issued a show cause notice proposing to levy a penalty under Section 271C of the amount equal to TDS. The High Court vide impugned judgment and order has dismissed the appeal preferred by the assessee by holding that failure to deduct/remit the TDS would attract a penalty under … " - Income tax penalty u/s 271c

Income tax penalty u/s 271c

Annual Increment earned by Govt Servant for Past period can

WebApr 13, 2024 · The Supreme Court in this case was considering whether the appellant was liable for penalty u/s 271C even though there was mere delay in payment as the … WebNote : No penalty is imposable for any failure under sections 271 (1) ( b), 271A, 271AA, 271B, 271BA, 271BB, 271C, 271CA, 271D, 271E, 271F, 271FA, 271FAB, 271FB, 271G, 271GA, 271GB, 271H, 271-I, 272A (1) ( c) or ( d ), 272A (2), 272AA (1), 272B, 272BB (1), 272BB (1A), 272BBB (1), 273 (1) (b), 273 (2) (b) and 273 (2) (c) if the person or assessee …

Did you know?

WebNov 11, 2014 · However, the AO did not find merit in the submissions of the assessee and levied penalty U/S 271C of the Act vide order dt. 18th Aug., 2010. Being aggrieved, the … Web1. confirming penalty of Rs.1,81,00,765 u/s. 271C of I. T. Act, 1961. 2. confirming the above penalty on the ground that the eventhough the appellant had claimed that the parties to whom payments were made had paid the taxes whereever applicable in their individual capacity, the appellant had not submitted any documents in support of the same.

WebApr 10, 2024 · The Supreme Court Monday held that no penalty shall be leviable under section 271C of the Income Tax Act over mere belated remittance of the tax deducted at source (TDS) after its deduction by the ... WebOct 16, 2015 · CIT that, penalty U/s 271C is exigible if delay in remittance of TDS is caused due to unreasonable cause. Brief Facts of the Case: The assessee has delayed in …

WebSection 271C (1): (a) deduct the whole or any part of the tax as required by or under the provisions of Chapter XVII-B; or. (b) pay the whole or any part of the tax as required by or … WebApr 10, 2024 · New Delhi: The Supreme Court Monday held that no penalty shall be leviable under section 271C of the Income Tax Act over mere belated remittance of the tax …

WebApr 11, 2013 · Section 271C. If any person fails to deduct the whole or any part of the tax as required by or under the provisions of Chapter XVII-B then, such person shall be liable to pay, by way of penalty, a sum equal to the amount of tax which such person failed to deduct or pay as aforesaid.This penalty is imposable by Joint Commissioner.

WebSep 7, 2024 · Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c) Query asked by ANKUR AGRAWAL Post a comment 1.Assessment was completed u/s 143 (3)/147 making additions on account of discrepancies found in survey on account of Cash in hand and Stock in trade etc. 2.On appeal the additions made by A.O. were confirmed by CIT (A) vide order dated 06/02/2024 … highest quality natural cat supplementsWebApr 12, 2024 · Even the CBDT has decided to impose no penalty under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act for non-deduction of TDS, and no penalty is contemplated under Section … highest quality movie streaming serviceWebApr 15, 2024 · The Supreme Court has ruled that no penalty is leviable under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on mere delay in remittance of the tax deducted at source … highest quality natural pet supplementshttp://kb.icai.org/pdfs/PDFFile5b4f18e43e2db4.51472745.pdf how hard are clep examsWebApr 11, 2024 · 11 April 2024 3:15 AM GMT. The Supreme Court has ruled that no penalty is leviable under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on mere delay in remittance of the tax deducted at source (TDS ... highest quality of serviceWebApr 15, 2024 · The Supreme Court has ruled that no penalty is leviable under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on mere delay in remittance of the tax deducted at source (TDS) after the same has been deducted by the assessee. The bench of Justices M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar observed that the relevant words used in Section how happy is chinaWebApr 11, 2024 · The Supreme Court in this case was considering whether the appellant was liable for penalty u/s 271C even though there was mere delay in payment as the provisions of Section 271C dealt with penalty for failure to deduct the tax and not delayed payment of tax. ... 271C and 273B of Income-tax Act,1961: Counsel(s): Counsels : Dowload Pdf File ... how happy they are